From cf466c2ac5ac55bb9b30b96fbdcad564e8c1ccc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Clifton Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:35:33 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix memory corruption on Mach-O systems by suppressing a memory tidy up. PR target/19435 * mach-o.c (bfd_mach_o_close_and_cleanup): Suppress code to free dsym filename buffer. --- bfd/ChangeLog | 6 ++++++ bfd/mach-o.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/bfd/ChangeLog b/bfd/ChangeLog index abf583be18b..dcd6ea1425b 100644 --- a/bfd/ChangeLog +++ b/bfd/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2016-01-25 Nick Clifton + + PR target/19435 + * mach-o.c (bfd_mach_o_close_and_cleanup): Suppress code to free + dsym filename buffer. + 2016-01-24 Maciej W. Rozycki * elfxx-mips.c (BZ16_REG_FIELD): Simplify calculation. diff --git a/bfd/mach-o.c b/bfd/mach-o.c index 72454f9d0b6..0f39157ce69 100644 --- a/bfd/mach-o.c +++ b/bfd/mach-o.c @@ -5798,14 +5798,26 @@ bfd_mach_o_close_and_cleanup (bfd *abfd) if (mdata->dsym_bfd != NULL) { bfd *fat_bfd = mdata->dsym_bfd->my_archive; +#if 0 + /* FIXME: PR 19435: This calculation to find the memory allocated by + bfd_mach_o_follow_dsym for the filename does not always end up + selecting the correct pointer. Unfortunately this problem is + very hard to reproduce on a non Mach-O native system, so until it + can be traced and fixed on such a system, this code will remain + commented out. This does mean that there will be a memory leak, + but it is small, and happens when we are closing down, so it + should not matter too much. char *dsym_filename = (char *)(fat_bfd ? fat_bfd->filename : mdata->dsym_bfd->filename); +#endif bfd_close (mdata->dsym_bfd); mdata->dsym_bfd = NULL; if (fat_bfd) bfd_close (fat_bfd); +#if 0 free (dsym_filename); +#endif } } -- 2.30.2