From d0c45fcb75691c36967be2afa439f29ffb6709e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 16:27:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] tweak last patch --- bfd/elflink.h | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/bfd/elflink.h b/bfd/elflink.h index 62d0c5a730b..877f166ff86 100644 --- a/bfd/elflink.h +++ b/bfd/elflink.h @@ -887,20 +887,14 @@ elf_link_add_object_symbols (abfd, info) library is a function, since common symbols always represent variables; this can cause confusion in principle, but any such confusion would seem to indicate - an erroneous program or shared library. We also treat a - common symbol as a definition if the symbol in the shared - library is in an uninitialized section, and it has a - smaller size. */ + an erroneous program or shared library. */ if (dynamic && definition) { if (h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_defined || h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_defweak || (h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_common - && ((bind == STB_WEAK - || ELF_ST_TYPE (sym.st_info) == STT_FUNC) - || ((sec->flags & SEC_ALLOC) != 0 - && (sec->flags & SEC_LOAD) == 0 - && sym.st_size < h->size)))) + && (bind == STB_WEAK + || ELF_ST_TYPE (sym.st_info) == STT_FUNC))) { override = true; sec = bfd_und_section_ptr; @@ -911,6 +905,36 @@ elf_link_add_object_symbols (abfd, info) } } + /* If we already have a common symbol, and the symbol in the + shared library is in an uninitialized section, then treat + the shared library symbol as a common symbol. This will + not always be correct, but it should do little harm. */ + if (dynamic + && definition + && h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_common + && (sec->flags & SEC_ALLOC) != 0 + && (sec->flags & SEC_LOAD) == 0) + { + if (! ((*info->callbacks->multiple_common) + (info, h->root.root.string, + h->root.u.c.p->section->owner, bfd_link_hash_common, + h->root.u.c.size, abfd, bfd_link_hash_common, + sym.st_size))) + goto error_return; + + /* If the symbol in the shared library is smaller than + the one we already have, then override it to stick + with the larger symbol. Set SIZE_CHANGE_OK because + we only want to warn if requested with --warn-common. */ + if (sym.st_size < h->size) + { + override = true; + sec = bfd_und_section_ptr; + definition = false; + size_change_ok = true; + } + } + /* Similarly, if we are not looking at a dynamic object, and we have a definition, we want to override any definition we may have from a dynamic object. Symbols from regular -- 2.30.2