From d58a3182b1e680105731897fe2d84928daf89fce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Anholt Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:27:51 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] intel: Remove stale comment about non-intel gl_buffer_objects. This hasn't been true since dd26899ca39111e0866afed9df94bfb1618dd363 in 2009. Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick --- src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_buffer_objects.h | 9 +-------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_buffer_objects.h b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_buffer_objects.h index b174e93443c..e74d0612475 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_buffer_objects.h +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_buffer_objects.h @@ -84,14 +84,7 @@ void intel_upload_finish(struct intel_context *intel); */ void intelInitBufferObjectFuncs(struct dd_function_table *functions); - - -/* Are the obj->Name tests necessary? Unfortunately yes, mesa - * allocates a couple of gl_buffer_object structs statically, and - * the Name == 0 test is the only way to identify them and avoid - * casting them erroneously to our structs. - */ -static INLINE struct intel_buffer_object * +static inline struct intel_buffer_object * intel_buffer_object(struct gl_buffer_object *obj) { return (struct intel_buffer_object *) obj; -- 2.30.2