From d7f735269f78cce3ae9b8dd1a96013d185f0c883 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pedro Alves Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 12:06:50 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Explicitly mention yet-unloaded shared libraries in location spec examples Change-Id: I05639ddb3bf620c7297b57ed286adc3aa926b7b6 --- gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo index 3cf4e2c73c0..8c85c5a0c82 100644 --- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo +++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo @@ -9124,11 +9124,13 @@ spec matching no code locations in your program at all: @itemize @bullet @item The location spec specifies a function name, and there are no -functions in the program with that name. +functions in the program with that name, or they only exist in a +yet-unloaded shared library. @item The location spec specifies a source file name, and there are no -source files in the program with that name. +source files in the program with that name, or they only exist in a +yet-unloaded shared library. @item The location spec specifies both a source file name and a source line -- 2.30.2