From dac45ea36e2d1e5997848ef0e39976a04ea85153 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Stallman Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 02:03:04 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Comment change for meaning of TREE_CONSTANT_OVERFLOW. From-SVN: r2054 --- gcc/tree.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/tree.h b/gcc/tree.h index 15d89c9697a..1e510229575 100644 --- a/gcc/tree.h +++ b/gcc/tree.h @@ -228,8 +228,7 @@ struct tree_common implicitly and should not lead to an "unused value" warning. */ #define TREE_NO_UNUSED_WARNING(NODE) ((NODE)->common.static_flag) -/* In a NON_LVALUE_EXPR, this means there was overflow in folding. - The folded constant is inside the NON_LVALUE_EXPR. */ +/* In an INTEGER_CST, this means there was overflow in folding. */ #define TREE_CONSTANT_OVERFLOW(NODE) ((NODE)->common.static_flag) /* Nonzero for a TREE_LIST or TREE_VEC node means that the derivation -- 2.30.2