From daebe18e897b3dc87f2e8b156ce03691c8b930c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lisa Hsu Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:17:19 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] faults: i think these fault invocations should be panic and not fatal. it definitely made implementing a trace cpu easier this way. --- src/sim/faults.cc | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/sim/faults.cc b/src/sim/faults.cc index 0fe853785..6149a8335 100644 --- a/src/sim/faults.cc +++ b/src/sim/faults.cc @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ #if !FULL_SYSTEM void FaultBase::invoke(ThreadContext * tc) { - fatal("fault (%s) detected @ PC %p", name(), tc->readPC()); + panic("fault (%s) detected @ PC %p", name(), tc->readPC()); } #else void FaultBase::invoke(ThreadContext * tc) @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ void FaultBase::invoke(ThreadContext * tc) void UnimpFault::invoke(ThreadContext * tc) { - fatal("Unimpfault: %s\n", panicStr.c_str()); + panic("Unimpfault: %s\n", panicStr.c_str()); } #if !FULL_SYSTEM -- 2.30.2