From dbdaea4110d5c97ba1addef900516eea7846a2c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Phil Edwards Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:20:52 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] gcc.texi: The C++ standard isn't "draft" anymore. 2000-10-30 Phil Edwards * gcc.texi: The C++ standard isn't "draft" anymore. From-SVN: r37146 --- gcc/ChangeLog | 4 ++++ gcc/gcc.texi | 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index c631e6dd868..70b91723c1e 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2000-10-30 Phil Edwards + + * gcc.texi: The C++ standard isn't "draft" anymore. + 2000-10-30 Mark Mitchell * cppmacro.c (builtin_macro): Use NT_VOID, not T_VOID. diff --git a/gcc/gcc.texi b/gcc/gcc.texi index b215e4dd244..92b5db3e464 100644 --- a/gcc/gcc.texi +++ b/gcc/gcc.texi @@ -1683,7 +1683,7 @@ class Foo This declaration only establishes that the class @code{Foo} has an @code{int} named @code{Foo::bar}, and a member function named @code{Foo::method}. But you still need to define @emph{both} -@code{method} and @code{bar} elsewhere. According to the draft ANSI +@code{method} and @code{bar} elsewhere. According to the ISO standard, you must supply an initializer in one (and only one) source file, such as: -- 2.30.2