From dc377e879af19ade5acfefce619c484c93ca8e74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bernhard Fischer Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:35:32 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] tree-flow-inline.h.c (next_readonly_imm_use): Fix typo in comment. 2007-12-15 Bernhard Fischer * tree-flow-inline.h.c (next_readonly_imm_use): Fix typo in comment. From-SVN: r130954 --- gcc/ChangeLog | 6 +++++- gcc/tree-flow-inline.h | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index 87df41bbf29..51ab60ed090 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,4 +1,8 @@ -2007-12-15 Bernhard Fischer <> +2007-12-15 Bernhard Fischer + + * tree-flow-inline.h.c (next_readonly_imm_use): Fix typo in comment. + +2007-12-15 Bernhard Fischer * toplev.c (process_options): Fix typo in warning. diff --git a/gcc/tree-flow-inline.h b/gcc/tree-flow-inline.h index 4669588558e..1074f680caa 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-flow-inline.h +++ b/gcc/tree-flow-inline.h @@ -497,8 +497,8 @@ next_readonly_imm_use (imm_use_iterator *imm) use_operand_p old = imm->imm_use; #ifdef ENABLE_CHECKING - /* If this assertion fails, it indicates the 'next' pointer has changed - since we the last bump. This indicates that the list is being modified + /* If this assertion fails, it indicates the 'next' pointer has changed + since the last bump. This indicates that the list is being modified via stmt changes, or SET_USE, or somesuch thing, and you need to be using the SAFE version of the iterator. */ gcc_assert (imm->iter_node.next == old->next); -- 2.30.2