From ddacd3d43b203e7c66ec366820e2a230b7e3aa67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 16:35:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] intel/perf: fix improper pointer access

This expression was unused by the macro, probably why it didn't
register in the compilation.

Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Cc: <mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Janes <mark.a.janes@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
---
 src/intel/perf/gen_perf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/intel/perf/gen_perf.c b/src/intel/perf/gen_perf.c
index 0aa3845a29c..4c47aa6dcf2 100644
--- a/src/intel/perf/gen_perf.c
+++ b/src/intel/perf/gen_perf.c
@@ -2296,7 +2296,7 @@ accumulate_oa_reports(struct gen_perf_context *perf_ctx,
    first_samples_node = query->oa.samples_head->next;
 
    foreach_list_typed_from(struct oa_sample_buf, buf, link,
-                           &perf_ctx.sample_buffers,
+                           &perf_ctx->sample_buffers,
                            first_samples_node)
    {
       int offset = 0;
-- 
2.30.2