From dead799736c6adf59e26e9088db34010aa6477f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brad Beckmann Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 14:01:02 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] mem-ruby: Consistent dprintf formats for issue outcomes Change-Id: I053fc42f0d5f678f8e3434b53a0f09e00fc3e345 Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/10221 Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power --- src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc b/src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc index 5977ce9ef..02d23790a 100644 --- a/src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc +++ b/src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc @@ -299,15 +299,16 @@ RubyPort::MemSlavePort::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt) // route the response pkt->pushSenderState(new SenderState(this)); - DPRINTF(RubyPort, "Request %s 0x%x issued\n", pkt->cmdString(), + DPRINTF(RubyPort, "Request %s address %#x issued\n", pkt->cmdString(), pkt->getAddr()); return true; } if (pkt->cmd != MemCmd::MemFenceReq) { DPRINTF(RubyPort, - "Request for address %#x did not issued because %s\n", - pkt->getAddr(), RequestStatus_to_string(requestStatus)); + "Request %s for address %#x did not issue because %s\n", + pkt->cmdString(), pkt->getAddr(), + RequestStatus_to_string(requestStatus)); } addToRetryList(); -- 2.30.2