From e042e6c3e25fd9189001b4c013bed281ac251067 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Jose E. Marchesi" Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 10:16:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] cpu: fix comment in bpf.cpu 2019-11-20 Jose E. Marchesi * bpf.cpu: Fix comment describing the 128-bit instruction format. --- cpu/ChangeLog | 4 ++++ cpu/bpf.cpu | 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/cpu/ChangeLog b/cpu/ChangeLog index 375cb199669..87cec69e4f7 100644 --- a/cpu/ChangeLog +++ b/cpu/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2019-11-20 Jose E. Marchesi + + * bpf.cpu: Fix comment describing the 128-bit instruction format. + 2019-09-09 Phil Blundell binutils 2.33 branch created. diff --git a/cpu/bpf.cpu b/cpu/bpf.cpu index aa01fbbb2ea..db2301c4952 100644 --- a/cpu/bpf.cpu +++ b/cpu/bpf.cpu @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ ;; Whereas the 128-bit instructions (at the moment there is only one ;; of such instructions, lddw) have the form: ;; -;; code:8 regs:8 offset:16 imm:32 imm:32 unused:32 +;; code:8 regs:8 offset:16 imm:32 unused:32 imm:32 ;; ;; In both formats `regs' is itself composed by two fields: ;; -- 2.30.2