From e389f80098efb019e8d166338894249770f26e6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Merrill Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 18:07:43 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] fix From-SVN: r23375 --- gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb43.C | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb43.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb43.C index 8690d11a038..7f8647226c8 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb43.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb43.C @@ -1,4 +1,7 @@ -// excess errors test - XFAIL *-*-* +// All the pointer_to_binary_function cases used to fail because g++ +// couldn't handle converting an overloaded function to a class type. +// The first one should still fail because it requires an implicit conversion +// to pointer_to_binary_function, which has an `explicit' constructor. #include #include @@ -13,7 +16,7 @@ public : template inline bool compare(const Expr a, const Expr b){ return true; }; -void main() +int main() { vector a(3); sort( a.begin(), a.end(), @@ -21,7 +24,7 @@ void main() sort( a.begin(), a.end(), compare ); sort::iterator, pointer_to_binary_function, const Expr, bool> > - ( a.begin(), a.end(), compare ); + ( a.begin(), a.end(), compare ); // ERROR - constructor is explicit sort( a.begin(), a.end(), ptr_fun, const Expr, bool> (compare) ); sort( a.begin(), a.end(), -- 2.30.2