From e41b988cc5af34e9c1a3d37b717fbfcc52d7ff90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gerald Pfeifer bad_alloc
)
even when malloc
is unable to allocate any more memory.
- With some versions of valgrind
+ With some versions of valgrind
this pool will be shown as "still reachable" when the process exits, e.g.
still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks
.
This memory is not a leak, because it's still in use by libstdc++,
@@ -710,7 +710,7 @@
In the past, a few people reported that the standard containers appear
to leak memory when tested with memory checkers such as
- valgrind.
+ valgrind.
Under some (non-default) configurations the library's allocators keep
free memory in a
pool for later reuse, rather than deallocating it with delete
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/faq.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/faq.xml
index cf8684e1cea..e419d3c22a0 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/faq.xml
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/faq.xml
@@ -993,7 +993,7 @@
of a few dozen kilobytes on startup. This pool is used to ensure it's
possible to throw exceptions (such as malloc
is unable to allocate any more memory.
- With some versions of still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks
.
This memory is not a leak, because it's still in use by libstdc++,
@@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@
delete
--
2.30.2