From e4c9cfb13806fd1f59239d031fa595bbaaa2f1de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: lkcl Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:15:09 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] --- openpower/sv/predication.mdwn | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/openpower/sv/predication.mdwn b/openpower/sv/predication.mdwn index 9e5c2f04e..6af4c9cad 100644 --- a/openpower/sv/predication.mdwn +++ b/openpower/sv/predication.mdwn @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ One of the design principles of SV is that the use of VL should be as closrly eq The implications here are that *register dependency hazards still have to be respected inter-element*. -Using a multi-issue out-of-order engine as the underlying microarchitectural basis this is not as difficult to achieve as it first seems. In addition, Vector Chaining should also be possible for a multi-issue out-of-order rngine to cope with, as long as false (unnecessary) Dependency Hazards are not introduced in between Vectors, where the dependencies actually only exist between elements *in* the Vector. +Using a multi-issue out-of-order engine as the underlying microarchitectural basis this is not as difficult to achieve as it first seems (the hard work habing been done by the Dependency Matrices). In addition, Vector Chaining should also be possible for a multi-issue out-of-order rngine to cope with, as long as false (unnecessary) Dependency Hazards are not introduced in between Vectors, where the dependencies actually only exist between elements *in* the Vector. The concept of recognising that it is the elements within the Vector that have Dependency Hazards rather than the Vectors themselves is what permits Cray-style "chaining". -- 2.30.2