From e77a2b027dce64c01152a744a65f785108e53939 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nathan Sidwell Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 09:33:43 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix explanation to match the post patch behaviour From-SVN: r32704 --- gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.ext/array4.C | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.ext/array4.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.ext/array4.C index 0d42951539d..2b53c6cbf34 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.ext/array4.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.ext/array4.C @@ -9,8 +9,7 @@ // [nathan] We have a zero sized array extension, and (unfortunately) allow it // to be the sole member of a struct (rather than the trailing member of a // non-empty struct as C99 is/will allow). Such a type will have a size of -// zero. Internally, we also use a TYPE_SIZE of zero to indicate an -// incompletable type. We must keep the two zeroes distinct -- arrgh! +// zero, but is not incomplete. struct A { -- 2.30.2