From e930bb444a25e5ecb72dc01514bb1115ccaec703 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: lkcl Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 12:55:54 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] --- openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn b/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn index 11762444a..f91dabce0 100644 --- a/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn +++ b/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn @@ -62,6 +62,11 @@ Therefore whilst we in LibreSOC as individuals are the actual non-affiliated arc The key person acting as the bridge between both world will be myself (Luke Leighton), and I will ensure *and require* that RED Semiconductor provides adequate funds and resources for the long haul, in order to not only see through the proposals but also ensure that the associated toolchains, test suites, documentation etc. are properly written and maintained, long-term. Yet I stress, again, that despite committing the financial resources, RED Semiconductor will *not* own the Copyright or any patents on LibreSOC work. +Our goal here is the ongoing long-term evolution of OpenPOWER, meeting +the needs of an entirely new market of end-users currently not served by +OpenPOWER, and still maintaining the long-term stability and reputation +of the OpenPOWER ecosystem. + My question to you is, therefore: what is the best way forward, here? What "vehicle" or arrangement would be suitable that takes into account these unique circumstances? Would a conference call perhaps be a good idea to discuss? Respectfully, -- 2.30.2