From e958411d39480c1315c21c06e5ae8d6bec01cbd6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: lkcl Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 22:32:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] --- openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn b/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn index 781db7f26..5349b0f79 100644 --- a/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn +++ b/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ Therefore whilst we in LibreSOC as individuals are the actual non-affiliated arc The key person acting as the bridge between both world will be myself (Luke Leighton), and I will ensure *and require* that RED Semiconductor provides adequate funds and resources for the long haul, in order to not only see through the proposals but also ensure that the associated toolchains, test suites, documentation etc. are properly written and maintained, long-term. Yet I stress, again, that despite committing the financial resources, RED Semiconductor will *not* own the Copyright or any patents on LibreSOC work. -My question to you is, therefore: what is the best way forward, here? What "vehicle" or arrangement would be suitable that takes into account these unique circumstances? Would a conference call perhaps be a good idea to discuss a way forward? +My question to you is, therefore: what is the best way forward, here? What "vehicle" or arrangement would be suitable that takes into account these unique circumstances? Would a conference call perhaps be a good idea to discuss? Respectfully, -- 2.30.2