From eb576b3eb697c6e6645fce2247b02434f750bde6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "programmerjake@6415f89267377da4199b62e82acfa94913226af1" Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:56:28 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] mv-swizzle could fuse with preceding instruction too --- simple_v_extension/specification/mv.x.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/simple_v_extension/specification/mv.x.rst b/simple_v_extension/specification/mv.x.rst index f174f7b08..f0ed748f1 100644 --- a/simple_v_extension/specification/mv.x.rst +++ b/simple_v_extension/specification/mv.x.rst @@ -53,5 +53,5 @@ question: do we need a swizzle MV.X as well? macro-op fusion =============== -there is the potential for macro-op fusion of mv-swizzle with the following instruction. +there is the potential for macro-op fusion of mv-swizzle with the following instruction and/or preceding instruction. -- 2.30.2