From ec0caa28c32322a0e05233de4858f0288c6cea3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: lkcl Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 21:46:25 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] --- openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn b/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn index 009b758d1..0b847710f 100644 --- a/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn +++ b/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Therefore whilst we in LibreSOC as individuals are the actual non-affiliated arc The key person acting as the bridge between both world will be myself (Luke Leighton), and I will ensure *and require* that RED Semiconductor provides adequate funds and resources for the long haul, in order to not only see through the proposals but also ensure that the associated toolchains, test duites, documentation etc. are properly written and maintained, long-term. Yet I stress, again, that despite committing the financial resources, RED Semiconductor will *not* own the Copyright or any patents on LibreSOC work. -My question to you is, therefore: what is the best way forward, here? What "vehicle" or arrangement would be suitable that takes into account these unique circumstances? Would a conference call perhape be a good idea to discuss a way forward? +My question to you is, therefore: what is the best way forward, here? What "vehicle" or arrangement would be suitable that takes into account these unique circumstances? Would a conference call perhaps be a good idea to discuss a way forward? Respectfully, -- 2.30.2