From f2844807a7e6a590dd42642a5484baf683cef73b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rahul Bedarkar Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 18:16:21 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] gnutls: update legal info GnuTLS core library is licensed under LGPLv2.1+ while gnutls-openssl library is licensed under GPLv3+. Annotate the license with components. Reviewed-by: Marcin Nowakowski Signed-off-by: Rahul Bedarkar [Thomas: - add comment about the license of the "core library" since some files seems to be mistakenly under LGPLv3+ even though the library is licensed under LGPLv2.1+. - add the README file in the license information, since it contains a lot of useful details.] Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni --- package/gnutls/gnutls.mk | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/package/gnutls/gnutls.mk b/package/gnutls/gnutls.mk index 76d2ca2a7a..3cb08d1d29 100644 --- a/package/gnutls/gnutls.mk +++ b/package/gnutls/gnutls.mk @@ -8,8 +8,12 @@ GNUTLS_VERSION_MAJOR = 3.4 GNUTLS_VERSION = $(GNUTLS_VERSION_MAJOR).13 GNUTLS_SOURCE = gnutls-$(GNUTLS_VERSION).tar.xz GNUTLS_SITE = ftp://ftp.gnutls.org/gcrypt/gnutls/v$(GNUTLS_VERSION_MAJOR) -GNUTLS_LICENSE = GPLv3+, LGPLv2.1+ -GNUTLS_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING COPYING.LESSER +# README says that the core library is under LGPLv2.1+, but a few +# files in libdane specify LGPLv3+. It seems to be a mistake, and we +# therefore trust the README file here. A bug was reported upstream at +# https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/issues/109. +GNUTLS_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1+ (core library), GPLv3+ (gnutls-openssl library) +GNUTLS_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING COPYING.LESSER README GNUTLS_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf libtasn1 nettle pcre GNUTLS_CONF_OPTS = \ --disable-doc \ -- 2.30.2