From f32e7a74f705a6064436a107ca2c8cab6754d966 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Cagney Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 00:19:44 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] * sparc-tdep.c (sparc_push_dummy_frame): Use GDB_TARGET_IS_SPARC64 as test for 64 bit target. --- gdb/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ gdb/sparc-tdep.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 4d8d01b1ab4..a709c26e720 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2002-04-04 Andrew Cagney + + * sparc-tdep.c (sparc_push_dummy_frame): Use GDB_TARGET_IS_SPARC64 + as test for 64 bit target. + 2002-04-05 Andrew Cagney * h8500-tdep.c (h8500_write_fp): Delete function. diff --git a/gdb/sparc-tdep.c b/gdb/sparc-tdep.c index f8bba7e84db..ed3726e517b 100644 --- a/gdb/sparc-tdep.c +++ b/gdb/sparc-tdep.c @@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ sparc_push_dummy_frame (void) old function (sparc64_write_fp) did the below although I'm not clear why. The same goes for why this is only done when the underlying target is a simulator. */ - if (gdbarch_tdep (current_gdbarch)->intreg_size == 8) + if (GDB_TARGET_IS_SPARC64) { /* Target is a 64 bit SPARC. */ CORE_ADDR oldfp = read_register (FP_REGNUM); -- 2.30.2