From f7f475a6f414dcd69790a1a052910386cbbe0a93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Derek Hower Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:44:51 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] ruby: gave ALIASED_REQUEST priority over BUFFER_FULL in sequencer --- src/mem/ruby/system/Sequencer.cc | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mem/ruby/system/Sequencer.cc b/src/mem/ruby/system/Sequencer.cc index bef0d5412..3e0997708 100644 --- a/src/mem/ruby/system/Sequencer.cc +++ b/src/mem/ruby/system/Sequencer.cc @@ -354,16 +354,14 @@ void Sequencer::hitCallback(SequencerRequest* srequest, DataBlock& data) { // Returns true if the sequencer already has a load or store outstanding int Sequencer::isReady(const RubyRequest& request) { - if (m_outstanding_count >= m_max_outstanding_requests) { - return LIBRUBY_BUFFER_FULL; - } - if( m_writeRequestTable.exist(line_address(Address(request.paddr))) || m_readRequestTable.exist(line_address(Address(request.paddr))) ){ - //cout << "OUTSTANDING REQUEST EXISTS " << p << " VER " << m_version << endl; - //printProgress(cout); return LIBRUBY_ALIASED_REQUEST; } + + if (m_outstanding_count >= m_max_outstanding_requests) { + return LIBRUBY_BUFFER_FULL; + } return 1; } -- 2.30.2