split up section on conversions, into sub-sections
[libreriscv.git] / who_we_are.mdwn
1 ## We want to:
2
3 - give mass volume appliance manufacturers an alternative to expensive un-auditable chips.
4 - maximize the degree of trust a customer can place in their processor.
5
6 ## We do this by
7
8 providing the customer the **freedom to study, modify, and redistribute** the full SoC source from HDL and boot loader to down to the VLSI.
9
10 ## Libre-SOC is currently targeting:
11
12 - chromebooks
13 - smartphones
14 - tablets
15 - and industrial boards
16
17 ## Our First Product Will Be:
18
19 a (quad core, 800mhz, dual issue, GPU, VPU, [and later an ML inference core] ) SOC.
20
21 ## Why a Libre-SOC?
22
23 Its quite hard to guarantee that a performant processors (think pipelined, out-of-order) are functionally perfectly correct. In fact, it often turns out that they [aren’t](https://meltdownattack.com).
24
25 There are entire [dissertations](http://www.kroening.com/diss/diss-kroe.pdf) dedicated to the subject matter of merely functionally verifying a pipeline (this doesn’t even consider out of order execution).
26
27 Given the fact that performant bug-free processors no longer exist, how can you trust your processor? The next best thing is to have access to a processor’s design files. Not only have access to them, you must have the freedom to study and improve them.
28
29 Such a processor is referred to as a Libre processor. However, processors themselves are only a part of the picture. Nowadays, most contemporary computing tasks involve artificial intelligence, media consumption, wireless connectivity, etc... Thus, we must deliver an entire Libre-SOC.
30
31 ## Benefits: Privacy, Safety-Critical, Peace of Mind...
32 Our Libre-SOC will not have backdoors that plague modern [processors](https://www.csoonline.com/article/3220476/researchers-say-now-you-too-can-disable-intel-me-backdoor-thanks-to-the-nsa.html).
33
34 There is a very real need for reliable safety critical processors (think airplane, smart car, nuclear power plant, pacemaker...).
35 Libre-SOC posits that it is impossible to trust a processor in a safety critical environment without both access
36 to that processor's source and a cycle accurate HDL simulator that guarantees developers their code behaves as they
37 expect. An ISA level simulator is no longer satisfactory.
38
39 Refer to this [IEEE article](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4519604) by Cyberphysical System expert Ed-Lee for more details.
40
41 ## Still Have Questions?
42
43 Read about the business and practical benefits of a Libre-SOC below.
44
45 [[why_a_libresoc]]
46
47 See our [[3d_gpu/mission_statement]]