LS bug process: Comment on branch names

diff --git a/HDL_workflow/libresoc_bug_process.mdwn b/HDL_workflow/libresoc_bug_process.mdwn
index 1cf0a848bf0efae029eb1e2ca34b46143f4d5dcf..01bedad0d240636d8b641e45a05c388637431f20 100644 (file)
--- a/HDL_workflow/libresoc_bug_process.mdwn
+++ b/HDL_workflow/libresoc_bug_process.mdwn
@@ -268,6 +268,9 @@ an issue at all, it is to be set to either of the following:
 grant sub-task/s, and budget considered, *then* work can proceed in a separate
 branch. Only after fixes have been confirmed to keep the CI tests passing,
 can they be rebased (to keep commit history) into the master branch.
+  - *Note*: branch names **should not include personal info** such as names.
+    This is because others may require to use or work on the branch, and no
+    single developer owns a branch.
 
 This procedure adds a time delay between the issue discovery and
 start of work. This is important however because it allows for team members